Monday, December 12, 2011

So close, but so far, too! (La Manche bound)


When the water is only bound between two countries, then that bound can be easily shaken either  by some little force.


If you ever read the novel  "1984" by George Orwell, then, this little story will be interested for you.
But, if you're not read it jet, this post will make you interesting for that book and then you will wont to read it, and then again, my mission will be accomplished.

For the begining, let’s face with some historical facts and consequences that those facts brings to us.
.


First of all, The Hundred Years' War (picture above) can’t be so simply deleted from the memories of the descendants of people who have died for their homeland. Even for 1000 years, that won‘t be forgotten, never.

I wonder if it was the only conflict in the Europe area from the history...
 
Thus, under all the masks and quasi democracy, and quasi unification of all countries that are inherently different because they carry within them the people of different races, religions, cultures, languages ​​... in this times you can’t just create a unified Empire which, in the ideals of their theoretical power should be side by side, just as one unified People's Republic China, or great Russia, or even the vast U.S., that it's unity above all well-founded, and had a great privilege, all 52 states in the U.S. use the same language!

Although enormous over human efforts to make it happen, states have changed their currencies, educational systems, social issues have changed dramatically, workers can’t retierment in ages as bewore, they must work a few years more, people works more, more money is spent, workin' class is subordinate by them leaders, all to create some sort of empire ... but, THEY FAILED. They failed because they made empire which doesn’t serve to anything ... because heads of states have neglected onelittle” thing - HISTORY, history which is common to all of them!
.


History which every single state has wrote for itself for many years, and which, on the opposite sides, contained just of the current members of the same comrade of the Europian Union.
To be honest, all the leaders of the current states are liketime-tempin' bombs”, and they can’t wait the moment when another one will be downgraded by them, and, moreover, raised themselves, because the tails are drawn from the past.

“Miserable is the one that has someone else to humiliate, to elevate himself” -  "the old wisdom"

In this post I will avoid mighty Germany, because it is a story for itself, and, if you would agree, they had more violenter history than any other, but now I will certainly look back on a “The Hundred Years War” that was occurred beetwen France and Britain.


* It should be noted that both of them were the colony impires, and that fact earmarked them, unlike the small states, which were in the past only defending against various emperors, and whose descendants still carry the purest blood characteristics of patriotism and honesty and moral values ​​of his dignified knights countries; these colonists werehonoring” their descendants with desire for others properties, they get “more complex values” too, and desire for oppression and covert manners of slave owners ...


Such people, a mixture of those characteristics and qualities in the people whose countries are now strong enough to tailor the destiny of other nations in Europe, they can only make some kind of crap, that is certainly happened, because none of them makes global objectives, neither sets goals which will be good for union, but only to their own goals with interwoven benefits, that is a main reason why all of The Europe is currentlyaparting at seams”.
 
The Kingdom of Great Britain had, if you look back, a lot of difficulties to join the E.U., regard it’s  applied in 1961, but had to wait for receiption fully 12 years, and, you guessed it, France was the opposed one. The then president, Charles de Gaulle, who had the opposition argued by the fact that Great Britain was maintained very close relations with the U.S., so, in the case of Great Britain entry into the E.U, U.S. could  have indirectly influensa throut further formation of the E.U, but it is clear that the French bother joining of the The Kingdom of Great Britain because of the painful history that they wrote together, just from different sides ...
 Of course, Great Britain is facing by joining the E.U. as a political integration, but primarly as an economic benefit in which a limitation of national sovereignty issue was not raised.
 
Today, The Kingdom of Great Britain is unique, some would say, favored, in the E.U. position in the community, given that it kept its currency (£), also has special requirements on entry of foreigners into the country (stricter criteria than the Schengen Agreement), and therefore it is geographically separated from Europe, it seems alienation and “relationship coldness” between continental E.U. and the so-calledThe island”.
 
The same geographic division is mentioned by George Orwell in the book “1984”. ... he was just then, “made” divisions at the world into Oceania, Euroasia and Eastasia.
In each of the empires ruled the omnipotent “Big Brother”.
Judging from the scenario that occurred in Europe currently, President of France, Nikolas Sarkozy  would like the most to become aBIG Brother”, from a multitude of reasons, but he had too strong competing in the appereance ofBIG Sister” with steel hag, the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel.
.
 
In the novel, Big Brother have four ministries (love, truth, peace and plenty), but the rulers of the E.U. have a few more, blaming the image under the auspices of democracy propagating sexual liberty, soft drugs, and animal rights more than the rights of hungry children, and anything else that is contrary to the basic principles and rights of healthy human being!
Of course, all this by terrifying obsessional mechanisms ... in the novel, it’s The EYE of the Big Brother, but, in reality of the EU, that tool is use to called: “MASS Media”!
During the story in novell takes a place in Oceania,  as the main enemy of Oceania (which at that time was in pact with Eastasia) mentioned Euroasia.
It is that union called Oceania, mayor members were U.S. and
The Kingdom of Great Britain, and the name Oceania named because those two members of the alliance were dividing by Atlantic Ocean.
Although Orwell in his story gave the novel predictions about how the world might look like if they took the orthodox Stalinism planetary dominance, that is not so far from the present and democratic society, ie, “cruel capitalism”.

.


Today, relations between Kingdom of Great Britain and the rest of Europe, led by Nikolas Sarkozy, are quite shaken, and people can smell the intolerance between these states!
Relationship between France and Kingdom of Great Britain is artificial and it’s only a matter of time before escalate.

.
 
Although some people says that capitalism is the highest form of democratic society and that democracy can only be developed into more completer forms of capitalism, there are those who would disagree with that fact, because the era of capitalism tramples all moral values ​​for their own goals, that SACRET money!

.
In all of us is one protagonist of the "1984", one sleepy character of Winston Smith.
Wake up, you sleepy Winston Smith! World needs you!

APPENDIX 1:
Eric Arthur Blair is the true name of the great writter, who used pseudonime George Orwell!
.

 That is very great introduction in the nowell:
Like little grama about that new language, "THE NEWSPEAK"

No comments:

Post a Comment